ON THE PRECISION OF THE NUCLEATOR

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5566/ias.1671

Keywords:

Monte Carlo resampling, nucleator, rat brain, stereology, variance prediction

Abstract

The nucleator is a design unbiased method of local stereology for estimating the volume of a bounded object. The only information required lies in the intersection of the object with an isotropic random ray emanating from a fixed point (called the pivotal point) associated with the object. For instance, the volume of a neuron can be estimated from a random ray emanating from its nucleolus. The nucleator is extensively used in biosciences because it is efficient and easy to apply. The estimator variance can be reduced by increasing the number of rays. In an earlier paper a systematic sampling design was proposed, and theoretical variance predictors were derived, for the corresponding volume estimator. Being the only variance predictors hitherto available for the nucleator, our basic goal was to check their statistical performance by means of Monte Carlo resampling on computer reconstructions of real objects. As a plus, the empirical distribution of the volume estimator revealed statistical properties of practical relevance.

Author Biographies

Javier González-Villa, University of Cantabria

Ph.D. Student. Department of Mathematics, Satatistics and Computation.

Marcos Cruz, University of Cantabria

Ph.D. Associate Professor. Department of Mathematics, Satatistics and Computation.

Luis M. Cruz-Orive, University of Cantabria

Ph.D. Professor. Department of Mathematics, Satatistics and Computation.

References

Cruz-Orive LM (1987). Particle number can be estimated using a disector of unknown thickness: the selector. J Microsc 145:121–42.

Cruz-Orive LM, Gual-Arnau X (2015). The invariator design: an update. Image Anal Stereol 34:147– 59.

Cruz-Orive LM, Ramos-Herrera ML, Artacho-Perula E (2010). Stereology of isolated objects with the invariator. J Microsc 240:94–110.

Foley A, Lane DA, Nielson GM, Franke R, Hagen H (1990). Interpolation of scattered data on closed surfaces. Computer Aided Geometric Design 7:303–12.

Gual-Arnau X, Cruz-Orive LM (2000). Systematic sampling on the circle and on the sphere. Adv Appl Prob 32:628–47.

Gual-Arnau X, Cruz-Orive LM (2002). Variance prediction for pseudosystematic sampling on the sphere. Adv Appl Prob 34:469–83.

Gundersen HJG (1988). The nucleator. J Microsc 151:3-21.

Hobolth A, Jensen EBV (2002). A note on design-based versus model-based variance estimators in stereology. Adv Appl Probab 34:484–90.

Howard C.V, Reed MG (2005). Unbiased stereology. Three-dimensional measurement in microscopy, 2nd ed. Oxford: Bios/ Taylor & Francis.

Jensen EBV (1998). Local Stereology. Singapore: World Scientific.

Ju T, Losasso F, Schaefer S, Warren J (2002). Dual contouring of hermite data. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), 21(3):339-46.

Klein R, Schilling A, Strasser W (1999). Reconstruction and simplification of surfaces from contours. In: The Seventh Pacific Conference on Computer Graphics and Applications (Pacific Graphics ’99), pp. 198-207. IEEE Computer Society.

Tandrup T (1993). A method for unbiased and efficient estimation of number and mean volume of specified neuron subtypes in rat dorsal root ganglion. J Compar Neurol 329:269–76.

West MJ (2012). Basic stereology for biologists and neuroscientists. New York: CSH Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor.

Downloads

Published

2017-06-23

How to Cite

González-Villa, J., Cruz, M., & Cruz-Orive, L. M. (2017). ON THE PRECISION OF THE NUCLEATOR. Image Analysis and Stereology, 36(2), 121–132. https://doi.org/10.5566/ias.1671

Issue

Section

Original Research Paper