ANALYSIS-ASSOCIATED FACTORS INTERFERING WITH DIFFUSION TENSOR INDICES OF PERIPHERAL NERVES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5566/ias.3332Keywords:
diffusion tensor imaging, fractional anisotropy, image analysis, perineural tissue, peripheral nerveAbstract
Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) enables a non-invasive assessment of tissue architecture based on water diffusion. Advancements in technology have expanded the application of DTI from the central nervous system to the peripheral nervous system. High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) systems have further enhanced the visualization of nerve compartments. This study investigates the influence of region of interest (ROI) selection on DTI indices in ex vivoperipheral nerves. Cadaveric median nerves (n=10) were harvested and immersed in fluorinated-carbon liquid, and 9-mm segments were independently scanned with a 9.4-T MRI system (scanning time 40 h). Diffusion-weighted signals were summed, and diffusion tensors were calculated for anatomical compartments using different delineation techniques. Following the initial scan, five samples were scanned for the second time using an identical protocol. The analysis showed that the inclusion of an inert background into the ROI significantly reduces fractional anisotropy (FA). Significant differences in diffusion tensors were observed between the initial and intermediate nerve portions, with FA and mean diffusivity (MD) differing by as much as 25.2% and 25.6%, respectively. Tracing the fascicles without the interfascicular epineurium exhibited an 8.8% lower FA compared to the delineations of the epineurium. Second MRI scans showed significant changes in diffusion tensors with higher eigenvalues D1-D3 and MD. In conclusion, the intermediate portions of the nerve demonstrated greater consistency in DTI indices and are therefore recommended for analysis over the initial portions. Using an inert liquid can minimize background effects, but the inherent diffusion properties of the tissue must be carefully considered. Prolonged scanning times can alter diffusion tensors, likely due to autolytic processes, underscoring the importance of consistent pre-scanning conditions and acquisition protocols. Additionally, maintaining consistency in delineations is paramount, regardless of whether the tracing method includes or excludes the interfascicular epineurium.
References
Alibegović, A., Umek, N., Pušnik, L., & Zubiavrre Martinez, I. (2024). Comparison of the Visual Scoring Method and Semi-Automatic Image Analysis for Evaluating Staining Intensity of Human Cartilage Sections. Image Analysis and Stereology, 43(2), 131–137. https://doi.org/10.5566/ias.3171
Awais, K., Snoj, Ž., Cvetko, E., & Serša, I. (2022). Diffusion Tensor Imaging of a Median Nerve by Magnetic Resonance: A Pilot Study. Life, 12(5), 748. https://doi.org/10.3390/life12050748
Bihan, D. (1995). Molecular diffusion, tissue microdynamics and microstructure. NMR in Biomedicine, 8(7), 375–386. https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.1940080711
Breckwoldt, M. O., Stock, C., Xia, A., Heckel, A., Bendszus, M., Pham, M., Heiland, S., & Bäumer, P. (2015). Diffusion Tensor Imaging Adds Diagnostic Accuracy in Magnetic Resonance Neurography. Investigative Radiology, 50(8), 498–504. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000000156
Chen, H., Xu, Y., Wang, W., Deng, R., Li, Z., Xie, S., & Jiao, J. (2023). Assessment of Lumbosacral Nerve Roots in Patients with Type 2 Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Using Diffusion Tensor Imaging. Brain Sciences, 13(5), 828. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13050828
Cosottini, M., & Roccatagliata, L. (2021). Neuroimaging at 7 T: are we ready for clinical transition? European Radiology Experimental, 5(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41747-021-00234-0
Gallagher, T. A., Simon, N. G., & Kliot, M. (2015). Diffusion tensor imaging to visualize axons in the setting of nerve injury and recovery. Neurosurgical Focus, 39(3), E10. https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.6.FOCUS15211
Goyal, M., Samuel, A. J., & Mittal, A. (2022). Diffusion tensor imaging in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy: Fractional anisotropy and apparent diffusion coefficient dataset of posterior tibial nerve. Data in Brief, 43, 108421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2022.108421
Jeon, T., Fung, M. M., Koch, K. M., Tan, E. T., & Sneag, D. B. (2018). Peripheral nerve diffusion tensor imaging: Overview, pitfalls, and future directions. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 47(5), 1171–1189. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.25876
Koo, T. K., & Li, M. Y. (2016). A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 15(2), 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
Lehmann, H. C., Zhang, J., Mori, S., & Sheikh, K. A. (2010). Diffusion tensor imaging to assess axonal regeneration in peripheral nerves. Experimental Neurology, 223(1), 238–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expneurol.2009.10.012
Longmore, D. B. (1989). The principles of magnetic resonance. British Medical Bulletin, 45(4), 848–880. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a072371
Prats‐Galino, A., Čapek, M., Reina, M. A., Cvetko, E., Radochova, B., Tubbs, R. S., Damjanovska, M., & Stopar Pintarič, T. (2018). 3D reconstruction of peripheral nerves from optical projection tomography images: A method for studying fascicular interconnections and intraneural plexuses. Clinical Anatomy, 31(3), 424–431. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.23028
Pušnik, L., Serša, I., Umek, N., Cvetko, E., & Snoj, Ž. (2023). Correlation between diffusion tensor indices and fascicular morphometric parameters of peripheral nerve. Frontiers in Physiology, 14:1070227. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2023.1070227
Seehaus, A., Roebroeck, A., Bastiani, M., Fonseca, L., Bratzke, H., Lori, N., Vilanova, A., Goebel, R., & Galuske, R. (2015). Histological validation of high-resolution DTI in human post mortem tissue. Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, 9(JULY), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnana.2015.00098
Snoj, Ž., Pušnik, L., Cvetko, E., Burica Matičič, U., Jengojan, S. A., & Omejec, G. (2024). Sciatic nerve fascicle differentiation on high‐resolution ultrasound with histological verification: An ex vivo study. Muscle & Nerve, 70(2), 265–272. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.28181
Snoj, Ž., Serša, I., Maticic, U., Cvetko, E., & Omejec, G. (2020). Nerve fascicle depiction at MR microscopy and high-frequency us with anatomic verification. Radiology, 297(3), 672–674. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020201910
Sveinsson, B., Rowe, O. E., Stockmann, J. P., Park, D. J., Lally, P. J., Rosen, M. S., Barry, R. L., Eichler, F., Rosen, B. R., & Sadjadi, R. (2022). Feasibility of simultaneous high‐resolution anatomical and quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of sciatic nerves in patients with Charcot–Marie–Tooth type 1A (CMT1A) at 7T. Muscle & Nerve, 66(2), 206–211. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.27647
Wang, X., Luo, L., Xing, J., Wang, J., Shi, B., Li, Y.-M., & Li, Y.-G. (2022). Assessment of peripheral neuropathy in type 2 diabetes by diffusion tensor imaging. Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery, 12(1), 395–405. https://doi.org/10.21037/qims-21-126
Weber, M., Wilhelm, T., & Schmidt, V. (2021). Multidimensional Characterisation of Time-dependent Image Data: A Case Study for the Peripheral Nervous System in Ageing Mice. Image Analysis & Stereology, 40(2), 85–94. https://doi.org/10.5566/ias.2499
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Luka Pušnik, Lucija Laubry, Igor Serša, Armin Alibegović, Erika Cvetko, Žiga Snoj, Nejc Umek
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
