Comparison of Profile Counting and Diameter Measurement for Estimating the Length Density of Seminiferous Tubules or Epididymal Duct

Authors

  • Wei Xu
  • Yang Guo
  • Zheng-Wei Yang North Sichuan Medical College

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5566/ias.3123

Keywords:

epididymal duct, isotropic sections, seminiferous tubules, length density, stereology

Abstract

Transverse testicular sections are often used for histopathological studies and length of seminiferous tubules in the testis is often estimated by the tubule volume divided by the tubules’ cross-sectional area, with the area being obtained by measuring the (short axial) diameters of the round (or elliptical) tubule profiles. But unbiased stereological length estimation is best based on counting of tubule profiles on isotropic sections. To determine the bias of length estimation with the diameter measurement, (i) transverse sections (methacrylate embedded) were obtained from a testis of each normal mature male Sprague-Dawley rat (10 rats in total) and isotropic sections obtained (with the orientator) from the other testis of the rat, and (ii) the tubule length densities were estimated with both methods of profile counting and diameter measurement. The results demonstrated that the method of diameter measurement on transverse or isotropic sections overestimated the length density by 20%-25% compared with profile counting on isotropic sections, probably mainly because of underestimation of the tubules’ cross-sectional area estimated from the short-axial diameters. Length density of the epididymal duct in the epididymis was also estimated with profile counting in the present study, using transverse and isotropic sections for comparison, and a significant statistical difference was not found between the results obtained with the transverse and isotropic sections.

Author Biography

  • Zheng-Wei Yang, North Sichuan Medical College

    Professor, Research Institute of Basic Medicine and Forensics School

References

Aherne WA, Dunnill MS (1982). Morphometry. London: Edward Arnold (Publishers) Ltd.

Clermont Y, Huckins C (1961). Microscopic anatomy of the sex cords and seminiferous tubules in growing and adult male albino rats. Am J Anat 108:79–97.

Gundersen HJ (1977). Notes on the estimation of the numerical density of arbitrary profiles: the edge effect. J Microsc 111:219-23.

Gundersen HJ (2002). Stereological estimation of tubular length. J Microsc 207:155-60.

Gundersen HJ, Bendtsen TF, Korbo L, Marcussen N, Møller A, Nielsen K, Nyengaard JR, Pakkenberg B, Sørensen FB, Vesterby A, West MJ (1988). Some new, simple and efficient stereological methods and their use in pathological research and diagnosis. APMIS 96:379-94.

Guo Y, Li JM, Xiang Y, Li YY, Huang J, Deng XZ, Yang ZW (2019). Quantitative (stereological) study of the epididymis and seminal vesicle in the rat from young to old. Andrologia 51:e13247.

Haynes JD (1964). Estimation of blood vessel surface area and length in tissue. Nature 201:425-6.

Ma L, Guo Y, Yuan Y, Li YG, Deng XZ, Yang ZW (2016). Morphometric study of the testis and reproductive tract (including sperm granuloma) after vasectomy in mature rats. Asian J Androl 18:66-73.

Mattfeldt T, Mall G, Gharehbaghi H, Möller P (1990). Estimation of surface area and length with the orientator. J Microsc 159:301-17.

Nyengaard JR (1999). Stereologic methods and their application in kidney research. J Am Soc Nephrol 10:1100-23.

Wang D, Guo Y, Li Y, Wen X, Yang Z (2021). A stereological study of key histological structures in the kidneys of rats from young to old age. International Journal of Clinical Urology 5:94-107.

Wang D, Wen XH, Guo Y, Xiang Y, Yang ZW (2020). Comparison of two stereological methods with counts and diameters of renal tubular profiles for estimating the length of renal tubules. Acta Anatomica Sinica 51:967-75. [Article in Chinese]

Wen XH, Yang ZW (2000). Quantitative (stereological) study on the spermatozoal storage capacity of epididymis in rats and monkeys. Asian J Androl 2:737.

Wreford NG (1995). Theory and practice of stereological techniques applied to the estimation of cell number and nuclear volume in the testis. Microsc Res Tech 32:423-36.

Xiang Y, Guo Y, Yang ZW (2018). A study of area and thickness compression of paraffin sections. Image Anal Stereol 37:205-12.

Xu W, Guo Y, Xiang Y, Yang ZW (2022). Research design with paired organs, supplemented with a study of bilateral difference in the weights of rat testes and epididymides. Chinese Journal of Stereology and Image Analysis 27:297-301. [Article in Chinese]

Yang Z, Zhang R, Wen X, Huang A (2000). Caveat on the error analysis for stereological estimates. Image Anal Stereol 19:9-13.

Yang ZW (2012). Essential Tools for Morphometric Studies of Biological Tissues: Practical Stereological Methods. Beijing: Science Press. [Book in Chinese]

Zhang RD, Wen XH, Kong LS, Deng XZ, Peng B, Huang AP, Wan Y, Yang ZW (2002). A quantitative (stereological) study of the effects of experimental unilateral cryptorchidism and subsequent orchiopexy on spermatogenesis in adult rabbit testis. Reproduction 124:95-105.

Zhengwei Y, McLachlan RI, Bremner WJ, Wreford NG (1997). Quantitative (stereological) study of the normal spermatogenesis in the adult monkey (Macaca fascicularis). J Androl 18:681-7.

Downloads

Published

2024-11-17 — Updated on 2024-11-29

Issue

Section

Original Research Paper

How to Cite

Xu, W., Guo, Y., & Yang, Z.-W. (2024). Comparison of Profile Counting and Diameter Measurement for Estimating the Length Density of Seminiferous Tubules or Epididymal Duct. Image Analysis and Stereology, 43(3), 239-247. https://doi.org/10.5566/ias.3123