Improving the Cavalieri estimator under non-equidistant sampling and dropouts

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5566/ias.2422

Keywords:

Cavalieri estimator, dropouts, Newton-Cotes quadrature, numerical integration with random nodes, stationary point process, variance estimation, weakly (m, p)-piecewise smooth function

Abstract

Motivated by the stereological problem of volume estimation from parallel section profiles, the so-called Newton-Cotes integral estimators based on random sampling nodes are analyzed. These estimators generalize the classical Cavalieri estimator and its variant for non-equidistant sampling nodes, the generalized Cavalieri estimator, and have typically a substantially smaller variance than the latter. The present paper focuses on the following points in relation to Newton-Cotes estimators: the treatment of dropouts, the construction of variance estimators, and, finally, their application in volume estimation of convex bodies.

Dropouts are eliminated points in the initial stationary point process of sampling nodes, modeled by independent thinning. Among other things, exact representations of the variance are given in terms of the thinning probability and increments of the initial points under two practically relevant sampling models. The paper presents a general estimation procedure for the variance of Newton-Cotes estimators based on the sampling nodes in a bounded interval. Finally, the findings are illustrated in an application of volume estimation for three-dimensional convex bodies with sufficiently smooth boundaries.

References

Baddeley AJ, Dorph-Petersen K-A, Jensen EBV (2006).

A note on the stereological implications of irregular spacing of sections.

J. Microsc 222:177--181.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2818.2006.01585.x

Cruz-Orive LM (1989).

On the precision of systematic sampling: a review

of Matheron's transitive methods.

J. Microsc 153:315--333.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2818.1989.tb01480.x

García-Fiñana M, Cruz-Orive LM (2004).

Improved variance prediction for systematic sampling on $R$.

Statistics 38:243--272.

https://doi.org/10.1080/0233188032000158826

Gardner RJ (2002).

The Brunn--Minkowski inequality.

Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 39: 355--405.

https://doi.org/10.1090/S0273-0979-02-00941-2

Gardner RJ (2006).

Geometric Tomography. (2nd edn.)

Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.

https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107341029

Kiderlen M, Dorph-Petersen K-A (2017).

The Cavalieri estimator with unequal section spacing revisited.

Image Anal. Stereol. 36:135--141.

https://doi.org/10.5566/ias.1723

Kiêu K (1997). Three Lectures on Systematic Geometric Sampling.

Memoirs 13, Department of Theoretical Statistics, University of Aarhus.

Koldobsky A (2005). Fourier Analysis in Convex Geometry.

Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, Am. Math. Soc., Providence RI.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/surv/116

Matheron G (1965).

Les Variables régionalisées et leur Estimation --

Une application de la théorie des Fonctions aléatoires aux Sciences de

la Nature. Masson et Cie, Paris.

Schneider R (2014). Convex Bodies: The Brunn--Minkowski Theory. (2nd edn.) Cambridge Univ.~Press, Cambridge.

https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139003858

Schneider R, Weil W (2008).

Stochastic and Integral Geometry.

Springer, Heidelberg.

Stehr M, Kiderlen M (2020). Asymptotic variance of Newton-Cotes quadratures based on randomized sampling points. To appear in Adv. Appl. Probab.

Ziegel J, Baddeley AJ, Dorph-Petersen K-A, Jensen EBV (2010).

Systematic sampling with errors in sample locations.

Biometrika 97:1--13.

https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/asp067

Ziegel J, Jensen EBV, Dorph-Petersen K-A (2011).

Variance estimation for generalized Cavalieri estimators.

Biometrika 98:187--198.

https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/asq064

Downloads

Published

2020-11-25

How to Cite

Stehr, M., & Kiderlen, M. (2020). Improving the Cavalieri estimator under non-equidistant sampling and dropouts. Image Analysis and Stereology, 39(3), 197–212. https://doi.org/10.5566/ias.2422

Issue

Section

Original Research Paper