WAVELET ANALYSIS AND NEURAL NETWORK CLASSIFIERS TO DETECT MID-SAGITTAL SECTIONS FOR NUCHAL TRANSLUCENCY MEASUREMENT

Authors

  • Giuseppa Sciortino University of Palermo
  • Emanuela Orlandi University of Palermo
  • Cesare Valenti University of Palermo
  • Domenico Tegolo University of Palermo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5566/ias.1352

Abstract

We propose a methodology to support the physician in the automatic identification of mid-sagittal sections of the fetus in ultrasound videos acquired during the first trimester of pregnancy. A good mid-sagittal section is a key requirement to make the correct measurement of nuchal translucency which is one of the main marker for screening of chromosomal defects such as trisomy 13, 18 and 21. NT measurement is beyond the scope of this article. The proposed methodology is mainly based on wavelet analysis and neural network classifiers to detect the jawbone and on radial symmetry analysis to detect the choroid plexus. Those steps allow to identify the frames which represent correct mid-sagittal sections to be processed. The performance of the proposed methodology was analyzed on 3000 random frames uniformly extracted from 10 real clinical ultrasound videos. With respect to a ground-truth provided by an expert physician, we obtained a true positive, a true negative and a balanced accuracy equal to 87.26%, 94.98% and 91.12% respectively.

References

Anzalone A, Fusco G, Isgr`o F, Orlandi E, Prevete R, Sciortino G, Tegolo D, Valenti C (2013). A system for the automatic measurement of the nuchal translucency thickness from ultrasound video stream of the foetus. In: Computer-Based Medical Systems.

Ballarò B, Florena A, Franco V, Tegolo D, Tripodo C, Valenti C (2008). An automated image analysis methodology for classifying megakaryocytes in chronic myeloproliferative disorders. Med Image Anal 12:703–12.

Bellavia F, Cacioppo A, Lupas¸cu C, Messina P, Scardina G, Tegolo D, Valenti C (2014). A nonparametric segmentation methodology for oral videocapillaroscopic images. Comput Meth Prog Bio 114:240–6.

Bernardino F, Cardoso R, Montenegro N, Bernardes J, Marques De S´a J (1998). Semiautomated ultrasonographic measurement of fetal nuchal translucency using a computer software tool. Ultrasound Med Biol 24:51–4.

Catanzariti E, Fusco G, Isgr`o F, Masecchia S, Prevete R, Santoro M (2009). A semi-automated method for the measurement of the fetal nuchal translucency in ultrasound images. In: Image Analysis and Processing, vol. 5716 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

Chalana V, Winter 3rd. TC, Cyr DR, Haynor DR, Kim Y (1996). Automatic fetal head measurements from sonographic images. Acad Radiol 3:628–35.

Chitty L, Hill L, White H, Wright D, Morris S (2012). Non invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy-ready for prime time? Am J Obstet Gynecol 206:269–75.

Cho HY, Kwon J, Kim YH, Lee KH, Kim J, Kim SY, Park YW (2012). Comparison of nuchal translucency measurements obtained using Volume NT and two- and three-dimensional ultrasound. Ultrasound Obst Gyn 39:175–80.

Deng Y,Wang Y, Chen P (2010). Automated detection of fetal nuchal translucency based on hierarchical structural model. In: Computer-Based Medical Systems.

Deng Y, Wang Y, Chen P, Yu J (2012). A hierarchical model for automatic nuchal translucency detection from ultrasound images. Comput Biol Med 42:706–13.

Di Ges`u V, Tabacchi M, Zavidovique B (2010). Symmetry as an intrinsically dynamic feature. Symmetry 2:554–81.

Di Ges`u V, Valenti C, Strinati L (1997). Local operators to detect regions of interest. Pattern Recogn Lett 18:1077–81.

Egmont-Petersen M, de Ridder D, Handels H (2002). Image processing with neural networks - a review. Pattern Recogn 35:2279–301.

Gonz´alez-Aud´ıcana M, Otazu X, Fors O, Seco A (2005). Comparison between Mallat’s and the ‘`a trous’ discrete wavelet transform based algorithms for the fusion of multispectral and panchromatic images. Int J Remote Sens 26:595–614.

Greene N, Platt L, Nicolaides K, Wald N, Wald N, Rodeck C, Rudnicka A, Hackshaw A (2004). In response to ‘Certificate of competence in performing specific procedures or tests in screening practice’. Prenatal Diag 24:315–20.

Holschneider M, Kronland-Martinet R, Morlet J, Tchamitchian P (1988). The `a trous algorithm. Tech. Rep. CPT-88/P.2215.

Jain R, Kasturi R, Schunck B (1995). Machine Vision. McGraw-Hill.

Lee Y, Kim M, Kim M (2007a). Robust border enhancement and detection for measurement of fetal nuchal translucency in ultrasound images.

Med Biol Eng Comput 45:1143–52. Lee YB, Kim MJ, Kim MH (2007b). Robust border enhancement and detection for measurement of fetal nuchal translucency in ultrasound images. Med Biol Eng Comput 45:1143–52.

Loy G, Zelinsky A (2003). Fast radial symmetry for detecting points of interest. T Pattern Anal 25:959–73. International Telecommunication Union (2013). Recommendation ITU-T H.264 / International Standard ISO/IEC 14496-10. Tech. rep.

Mogra R, Alabbad N, Hyett J (2012). Increased nuchal translucency and congenital heart disease. Early Hum Dev 88:261–7.

Moratalla J, Pintoffl K, Minekawa R, Lachmann R, Wright D, Nicolaides K (2010a). Semi-automated system for measurement of nuchal transhicency thickness. Ultrasound Obst Gyn 36:412–6.

Moratalla J, Pintoffl K, Minekawa R, Lachmann R, Wright D, Nicolaides KH (2010b). Semiautomated system for measurement of nuchal transhicency thickness. Ultrasound Obst Gyn 36:412–6.

Downloads

Published

2016-04-14

Issue

Section

Original Research Paper

How to Cite

Sciortino, G., Orlandi, E., Valenti, C., & Tegolo, D. (2016). WAVELET ANALYSIS AND NEURAL NETWORK CLASSIFIERS TO DETECT MID-SAGITTAL SECTIONS FOR NUCHAL TRANSLUCENCY MEASUREMENT. Image Analysis and Stereology, 35(2), 105-115. https://doi.org/10.5566/ias.1352

Most read articles by the same author(s)